Search for: "Rodriguez v. Evans"
Results 1 - 20
of 64
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jul 2015, 11:47 am
The post The Early Impact of Rodriguez v. [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 8:38 am
., Evans v. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 10:59 am
In 2015, the Supreme Court of the United States decided Rodriguez v. [read post]
13 Jan 2017, 9:07 am
Case citation: A.N. v. [read post]
14 Jul 2016, 10:30 am
Based upon Rodriguez v. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 9:39 am
By: Evan D. [read post]
12 Aug 2012, 10:30 pm
Evans nor Lawrence v. [read post]
6 Apr 2022, 6:43 am
Indeed, Rodriguez had the following exchange with Evan Solomon yesterday: Solomon: Can you justify why links are compensatory? [read post]
24 Feb 2007, 10:37 am
Evans, 2007 U.S. [read post]
22 Sep 2015, 8:29 pm
OPINION Opinion by Justice DAVID EVANS. [read post]
31 Jan 2007, 5:12 pm
Evans, 2007 U.S. [read post]
7 Oct 2016, 1:12 pm
Evans, 786 F.3d 779 (9th Cir. 2015), Judge Berzon applies the Supreme Court’s Rodriguez decision on a traffic stop prolonged for a dog sniff;• In In re Grand Jury Subpoena, JK-15-029, 828 F.3d 1083 (9th Cir. 2016), Judge Berzon discusses the use of overbroad grand jury subpoenas as the equivalent of general warrants and our privacy interests in electronic communications;• In United States v. [read post]
22 Sep 2015, 8:29 pm
OPINION Opinion by Justice DAVID EVANS. [read post]
9 Mar 2017, 9:01 pm
Earlier this week, in Peña-Rodriguez v. [read post]
23 May 2015, 10:24 am
This entry is a follow-up to the last entry in this blog, which discussed the case of Rodriguez v. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 9:08 pm
The key case is Rodriguez de Quijas v. [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 6:07 am
In Rodriguez v. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 7:14 am
Kerr says that Weinstein's ruling---insofar as it anticipates that the Supreme Court would overrule an old decision based on the rationales of newer cases---violates the rule laid down by the Supreme Court in Rodriguez de Quijas v. [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court heard argument in Rodriguez v. [read post]
19 Jan 2017, 4:44 am
Abassi and Hasty v. [read post]
